Prediction of Frew Mcmillan vs Ray Keldie Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
F. Mcmillan vs R. Keldie

Frew Mcmillan

RSA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

113

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Ray Keldie

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

113

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Mcmillan 1 - 0 Keldie

They have played 3 sets in total, with Frew Mcmillan winning 2 and Ray Keldie winning 1. The last match between Frew Mcmillan and Ray Keldie was at the Stockholm, 04-11-1974, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Frew Mcmillan getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Mcmillan	1
Keldie	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) Stockholm(11-04-74)

Stats

Frew Mcmillan

Ray Keldie

F. Mcmillan vs R. Keldie H2H Profile

F. Mcmillan	Stats	R. Keldie
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
44.14% (196-248)	Career Total W/L	37.87% (64-105)
1	Hard	0
2	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

F. Mcmillan vs R. Keldie Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Frew Mcmillan has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ray Keldie has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Frew Mcmillan, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ray Keldie has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Frew Mcmillan has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ray Keldie has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Frew Mcmillan has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Ray Keldie winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Frew Mcmillan has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 54% (W/L 7/6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 41% (W/L 48/69). Ray Keldie has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 54% (W/L 39/45), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 23% (W/L 8/27).
Player level: In the last year, Frew Mcmillan has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Ray Keldie has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Frew Mcmillan winning 1 times and Ray Keldie being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Frew Mcmillan winning 2 and Ray Keldie winning 1.
The last match between Frew Mcmillan and Ray Keldie was at the Stockholm, 04-11-1974, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Frew Mcmillan getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Frew Mcmillan has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Ray Keldie has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Frew Mcmillan has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ray Keldie has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Frew Mcmillan has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ray Keldie has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Frew Mcmillan vs Ray Keldie Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

F. Mcmillan vs R. Keldie H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

F. Mcmillan	Stats	R. Keldie
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
15	Games Won	13
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

F. Mcmillan Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Neu Ulm CH - 25-07-1983
R2 Christoph ZipfC. Zipf	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Johannesburg CH - 04-04-1983
R2 Denys MaasdorpD. Maasdorp	L	6-1 7-5	Stats
Neu Ulm CH - 26-07-1982
R3 Guillermo AuboneG. Aubone	L	7-6 6-4	Stats
Johannesburg CH - 04-04-1982
R2 David SmithD. Smith	L	7-5 3-6 6-2	Stats
Gstaad - 06-07-1981
R3 Ivan DupasquierI. Dupasquier	L	7-5 6-2	Stats

View All

R. Keldie Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Sydney Outdoor - 21-12-1975
R2 Jan KukalJ. Kukal	L	6-3 7-6	Stats
Hong Kong - 10-11-1975
R3 Corrado BarazzuttiC. Barazzutti	W	6-3 6-3	Stats
R4 Raul RamirezR. Ramirez	L	6-4 6-0	Stats
Perth - 26-10-1975
R3 Syd BallS. Ball	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Sydney Indoor - 19-10-1975
R3 Sandy MayerS. Mayer	L	6-0 6-3	Stats

View All

F. Mcmillan vs R. Keldie Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

F. Mcmillan	Stats	R. Keldie
44.14% (196/248)	YTD Win/Loss	37.87% (64/105)
45.90% (532/627)	Sets Win/Loss	41.82% (179/249)
48.02% (5322/5760)	Games Win/Loss	47.35% (2022/2248)
43.57% (61/79)	Hard Win/Loss	22.86% (8/27)
41.03% (48/69)	Clay Win/Loss	34.09% (15/29)
41.75% (43/60)	Indoor Hard W/L	0.00% (0/1)
52.11% (37/34)	Grass Win/Loss	46.43% (39/45)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
484.57	Average Opponent Rank	402.53
45.65% (21/25)	Slam W/L	30.77% (8/18)
40.00% (6/9)	Masters W/L	37.50% (3/5)
100.00% (2/0)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
44.30% (167/210)	Main Tour W/L	39.26% (53/82)
0.00% (0/4)	Challenger W/L	0% (0/0)
42% (148/352)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	40% (52/130)
49% (43/87)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	27% (9/33)
60% (9/15)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
45% (70/155)	Deciding Set Win %	32% (16/50)
75% (203/153)	1st Set Won, Won Match	77% (71/55)
25% (203/50)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	23% (71/16)
16% (236/38)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	8% (93/7)